Supreme Court Adjourns CBI’s Plea to Transfer Trial in Cases Against Yasin Malik to Delhi


The Supreme Court on Friday, March 8, 2025, adjourned the hearing of the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) plea seeking the transfer of trials against separatist leader Yasin Malik and co-accused from Jammu and Kashmir to Delhi. The next hearing is scheduled for April 4, 2025.

Why Was the Hearing Adjourned?

🔹 Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was unavailable for the proceedings, leading to the adjournment request by the CBI.
🔹 Yasin Malik, who is lodged in Tihar Jail, appeared via video conferencing and requested that the hearing be postponed until after Ramzan.
🔹 The Supreme Court granted the request, instructing Malik to be present through videoconferencing on April 4.


Background: CBI’s Plea for Trial Transfer

The CBI had filed a petition seeking the transfer of two cases involving Yasin Malik from Jammu to New Delhi. These cases include:
1️⃣ The 1989 Rubaiya Sayeed Kidnapping Case – Involving the abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of former J&K Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.
2️⃣ The 1990 Srinagar Shootout Case – Related to the killing of four Indian Air Force (IAF) personnel in Srinagar.

🔹 The CBI also challenged the Jammu court’s order (dated September 20-21, 2024) which had issued a production warrant against Malik in these cases.
🔹 In April 2023, the Supreme Court had stayed the Jammu court’s order, which had required Malik’s physical appearance for cross-examination of witnesses.



Supreme Court’s Directives & Proceedings

✔️ The Registrar General of the J&K High Court was instructed to ensure proper video conferencing facilities for Malik at a special court in Jammu, where his trial will be conducted.
✔️ Similarly, the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court was asked to ensure video conferencing access at Tihar Jail, where Malik is currently incarcerated.
✔️ On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court had given all six accused two weeks to respond to the CBI’s request to transfer the trials.

🚨 The court emphasized that all accused must be heard before transferring the trial.
🚨 The court also suggested setting up a makeshift courtroom inside the jail, referencing the fair trial given to Ajmal Kasab, the 26/11 Mumbai attack terrorist.


Current Legal Status of Yasin Malik

🔹 Jammu Court is hearing two major cases against Malik – the 1989 abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed and the 1990 Srinagar shootout.
🔹 He has been lodged in Tihar Jail since May 2023 after being convicted in a terror-funding case by a special NIA court.


Why is This Case Important?

🔥 The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to transfer Malik’s trial could have major legal and political implications.
🔥 The CBI argues that conducting the trial in Jammu poses security risks and wants it shifted to Delhi.
🔥 Opponents claim that shifting the trial might affect judicial fairness and regional sentiment.

The next hearing on April 4 will be crucial in determining whether Malik’s trial remains in Jammu or moves to Delhi.

🚀 What do you think? Should high-profile cases like this be shifted to Delhi for security reasons, or should they be tried locally? Drop your views in the comments below! 👇🔥

Comments

Popular posts

Father of RG Kar Victim Loses Faith in Legal System Amid Allegations of CBI Inconsistencies

Bill Gates Applauds India's 'Namo Drone Didi' Program: A Game-Changer in Rural Empowerment and Agri-Tech

Flight Operations Disrupted Amid India-Pakistan Tensions: Air India and IndiGo Cancel Multiple Flights on May 13, 2025

Equality Before Law

Your Complete Online Guide to Land Records and Services in Bihar

Rights of a Arrested Person in India

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Exploring Articles 236 to 238 of the Indian Constitution: A Contemporary Discourse