SC Orders States & UTs to Notify Special Education Teacher Posts by March 28
Introduction: A Landmark Order for Special Education
In a significant step towards strengthening inclusive education, the Supreme Court of India has directed all states and Union Territories (UTs) to notify sanctioned posts for special education teachers by March 28, 2025. The court has also ordered the immediate initiation of the selection process to fill these crucial positions.
The ruling was issued by a bench comprising Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice K Vinod Chandran, who emphasized that only qualified and competent teachers should be appointed to these positions.
Regularization of Ad-Hoc Special Educators
The Supreme Court acknowledged that in many states, special educators have been working on an ad-hoc basis for nearly two decades. To ensure job security and quality education, the court has ordered the formation of a scrutiny committee to assess and regularize these teachers based on their qualifications and merit.
The scrutiny committee will include:
✅ State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
✅ Secretary of the Education Department
✅ Nominee of the Rehabilitation Council of India (Field Expert)
✅ Legal Representative or Law Secretary (in case of absence of Disability Commissioner)
Mandatory Public Notification & Selection Process
To ensure transparency, the court mandated that all states and UTs must:
✔️ Notify the sanctioned posts within three weeks (by March 28, 2025)
✔️ Advertise vacancies in at least two widely circulated newspapers
✔️ Publish vacancies on the official Education Department website and state government websites
✔️ Expedite the selection and appointment process without unnecessary delays
This directive comes in response to a petition filed by Rajneesh Kumar Pandey and others, who highlighted the severe shortage of special educators across the country.
Failure to Implement 2021 SC Judgment
The Supreme Court expressed disappointment that despite its 2021 judgment, many states and UTs had neither identified nor filled these sanctioned posts. The court found that most states failed to take action, even though there were available figures indicating the number of children with special needs requiring specialized education.
The court noted that in many states:
🔴 No sanctioned posts were identified despite existing data on special needs children
🔴 Ad-hoc contractual teachers continued to teach special needs students without permanent employment
🔴 Some states, such as Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, and Manipur, cited logistical challenges in appointing trained teachers
The court, however, emphasized that these states must still begin the selection process, subject to the availability of qualified educators.
Right to Education & Special Educators: A Long-Standing Legal Battle
The petitioners argued that for the Right to Education (RTE) to be truly effective, it is crucial to appoint trained special educators in every school.
🔹 Advocate Prashant Shukla, representing the petitioners, pointed out that the petition was originally filed in 2016 by Rajneesh Kumar Pandey, a special educator working on a contract basis in Uttar Pradesh.
🔹 The Supreme Court treated the case as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and granted relief to special educators across India, recognizing the massive shortage of trained professionals for children with special needs.
This ruling is expected to create thousands of permanent job opportunities for special educators while ensuring better learning environments for children with disabilities.
Challenges & Road Ahead for Special Education in India
🔹 Lack of Trained Teachers – Many states struggle with shortages of trained professionals, especially in remote and underdeveloped regions.
🔹 Need for Infrastructure – Schools must be equipped with assistive technology and resources to support inclusive education.
🔹 Regularization & Fair Compensation – Many special educators work under uncertain job conditions and low pay. Permanent recruitment will ensure stability and quality education.
🔹 State Accountability – Strict monitoring is needed to ensure all states comply with the SC’s directive before the next hearing on July 15, 2025.
Conclusion: A Step Towards Inclusive Education
The Supreme Court’s directive is a major win for special educators and children with disabilities. It not only ensures the right to education for children with special needs but also brings job security to thousands of educators.
As the March 28 deadline approaches, all eyes are on the state governments to see if they comply with this landmark order. Will they act swiftly, or will further legal action be required?
🔥 Your Thoughts?
👉 Should the government create a national framework for recruiting special educators?
👉 How can we bridge the gap in special education training in India?
👉 Do you think states will meet the March 28 deadline?
Drop your opinions in the comments! Let's discuss. 🗣️
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment