Supreme Court Questions ECI on Deletion of 65 Lakh Voters from Bihar Draft Rolls Amid SIR Controversy
Supreme Court Demands Transparency from Election Commission
On August 7, 2025, the Supreme Court of India directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to respond by August 9 to a plea by the NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) seeking clarity on the deletion of approximately 65 lakh voters from Bihar's draft electoral rolls. These deletions were made following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) initiated by the ECI under its June 24 directive.
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N Kotiswar Singh instructed the ECI to furnish detailed data on the deleted voters, clarify whether these voters are dead, have permanently migrated, or were excluded for any other specific reason, and share the same with the NGO.
Background: The SIR and the Dispute
The ECI’s June 24 order had mandated a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections. The aim was to clean up the voter list, but it has drawn criticism for requiring a fresh verification process, including proof of citizenship for continued inclusion in the rolls.
Critics argue that this process risks disenfranchising poor, marginalised, and rural voters. The ADR and other petitioners—including RJD MP Manoj Jha, TMC MP Mahua Moitra, PUCL, and former Bihar MLA Mujahid Alam—have challenged the SIR process, alleging that it shifts the burden of proof onto voters and excludes widely held documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards.
Supreme Court Observes Data Gap
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing ADR, stated that the Election Commission failed to disclose which deleted voters were deceased or had migrated. The bench observed that while the current draft is not final, transparency is vital to avoid arbitrary exclusions. Justice Kant added, “We will see every voter likely to be affected and get the required information.”
The court will begin hearing the petitions challenging the ECI's SIR directive on August 12 and 13.
Claim: 75% of Enrolled Voters Lacked Proper Documentation
Bhushan alleged that 75% of the enrolled voters under SIR had submitted no supporting documents from the ECI’s 11 approved categories. Instead, their inclusion was based solely on the Booth Level Officer’s (BLO) recommendation, casting doubt on the integrity of the verification process.
The ADR's fresh application requests the publication of an assembly-wise list of deleted voters, with specific reasons for deletion such as death, migration, duplication, or being untraceable.
ECI’s Defence: Political Silence and Tech Tools
In its bulletin released on August 7, the ECI stated that no political party had filed any formal claim or objection against the draft electoral rolls between August 1 and August 6, 9 AM. However, 3,659 objections were received directly from electors. Additionally, 19,186 new voter applications (aged 18+) were submitted.
The Commission stated that 1.60 lakh Booth Level Agents (BLAs) from 12 political parties participated in the enumeration. Voters were able to verify their inclusion via EPIC number-based portals and could file objections or update details through the same system.
The ECI also reminded voters to submit fresh photographs to their BLOs by September 1, 2025, to ensure updated Voter ID cards.
Bihar SIR Sparks Political Storm
The Special Intensive Revision has triggered protests in Parliament by opposition parties under the INDIA bloc, claiming the process is being used to delete large sections of the voter base ahead of the elections. The controversy is unfolding amid rising demands for the ECI to ensure transparency and protect voter rights.
According to preliminary data, 35 lakh electors have either permanently migrated or could not be traced, while 65 lakh voter names have been excluded in total from the draft list.
Legal Context: The Road Ahead
While the ECI has maintained that proper procedures were followed, the Supreme Court’s ongoing scrutiny could reshape the future of electoral roll management in India. With a batch of constitutional petitions scheduled for hearing, the apex court will decide whether the current model of voter verification under SIR aligns with citizens' fundamental rights and democratic integrity.
Conclusion: Voter Verification vs. Voter Rights
The unfolding legal and political debate over Bihar’s electoral roll highlights a central tension in Indian democracy—between the need for a clean, accurate voter list and the risk of disenfranchising legitimate voters due to bureaucratic hurdles or unclear documentation rules.
As the Supreme Court takes up this matter on August 12, the outcome could have a nationwide impact on how voter rolls are maintained and revised in the future.
Comments
Post a Comment