Elephant Madhuri Relocated to Vantara: Supreme Court Upholds Welfare Over Custom
Supreme Court Intervenes for Madhuri’s Welfare
In a landmark decision prioritising animal welfare over long-standing religious customs, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the Ministry of Environment’s High Powered Committee (HPC) order to relocate Elephant Madhuri, also known as Mahadevi, from a Mutt in Kolhapur to the Vantara facility in Jamnagar, Gujarat. The transfer, completed per the Court’s directives, followed years of documented welfare violations and a string of legal proceedings.
Documented Abuse and Legal Violations
Animal welfare NGO PETA India had been closely monitoring Madhuri’s condition since 2022. On 31 October 2023, they filed a detailed complaint to the HPC, appending veterinary reports, photographs, and other records highlighting both physical injuries and psychological distress inflicted upon the elephant. Notably, the complaint revealed:
-
13 unauthorised transfers between Maharashtra and Telangana (2012–2023)
-
Commercial exploitation in public processions, including Muharram, begging, and even children being made to sit on her trunk
-
Use of the banned metal ankush for control
-
Instances where pooja sessions were auctioned off for money
-
In 2017, Madhuri fatally injured the Mutt’s head priest, raising grave safety concerns
Veterinary Inspections and Findings
On 12 August 2023, a veterinary team (on police request) conducted an inspection and found:
-
Open wounds and footpad thinning
-
Signs of lameness
-
Behavioural stress symptoms
A subsequent detailed medical evaluation by Dr. Rakesh Chittora of Animal Rahat (Oct 2023) confirmed the urgent need for hospitalisation and rehabilitation. It also noted that the mahout lacked fundamental knowledge of elephant care.
High Powered Committee Action
Initially, the HPC allowed the Mutt three months from June 2024 to improve Madhuri’s condition. Follow-up checks in June and November 2024 found no substantial improvement.
Consequently, on 27 December 2024, the HPC passed an official order directing relocation of the elephant to Radha Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust (RKTEWT)—operated by Vantara in Jamnagar. The facility was chosen based on its natural enclosures, trained elephant handlers, and on-site veterinary care.
Legal Challenges and Judicial Endorsement
The Mutt challenged the relocation in the Bombay High Court, but on 16 July 2025, the court dismissed their plea, affirming the HPC’s decision.
The Supreme Court then upheld this ruling on 28 July 2025, giving a two-week deadline for Madhuri's transfer. The matter is listed for compliance reporting on 11 August 2025.
Vantara’s Role: Fulfilling Judicial Directive
In a press statement, Vantara clarified:
-
It did not initiate or request the transfer.
-
It was designated by the HPC solely based on merit and capacity.
-
The promoter family supporting Vantara philanthropically has no involvement in its daily operations or the court case.
Vantara stressed that failure to comply would have amounted to contempt of court.
Misinformation and Judicial Integrity
Vantara expressed concern about a "campaign of misinformation" being spread against the organisation despite full legal closure. The statement reiterated:
“When the highest courts have heard and decided a matter, continuing to attack a neutral party that has merely followed orders is not only unfair—it undermines public faith in judicial process.”
The facility reaffirmed its commitment to lawful, ethical animal care, having acted entirely in line with regulatory and judicial mandates.
Broader Implications
This case underscores a vital legal precedent: Animal welfare can override customary practices, particularly where documented abuse exists. It also highlights the need for transparent, science-based, and humane management of temple and privately owned elephants in India.
As the judiciary continues to interpret the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, and address the balance between tradition and animal rights, this decision may guide future cases of animal custody and public interest litigation.
Comments
Post a Comment