Pune Porsche Car Case: Accused “Played with Judiciary” by Tampering with Evidence, Says Prosecution

Pune Porsche Car Case: Accused “Played with Judiciary” by Tampering with Evidence, Says Prosecution 

In a dramatic turn of events, the prosecution in the Pune Porsche car case has alleged that the six accused tampered with evidence, effectively "playing with the judicial system." The case involves a tragic accident on May 19, where a Porsche car, allegedly driven by a minor under the influence, killed two IT professionals in Pune's Kalyani Nagar area.

Background of the Case

On May 19, a high-speed Porsche car, driven by a minor, collided with two IT professionals, resulting in their deaths. The incident drew national attention and led to a complex legal battle. The accused include the minor's parents—Vishal Agarwal and Shivani Agarwal—along with medical professionals and middlemen who are alleged to have conspired to alter evidence.

Allegations of Evidence Tampering

Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Shishir Hiray has argued that the accused, including the minor's parents, engaged in a deliberate effort to sabotage the case by manipulating evidence. The prosecution's stance is that tampering with evidence undermines the judicial process and the victims' right to justice. Hiray referenced the Supreme Court's cancellation of bail for former Uttar Pradesh minister Amarmani Tripathi, highlighting how the risk of evidence tampering justified bail denial.

Financial Influence and Accused’s Resources

The prosecution claims that the accused's family utilized their financial resources to obstruct justice. The Agarwals, known for their financial clout, allegedly used their wealth to influence the case, ensuring the minor’s bail and manipulating the legal proceedings.

Amarmani Tripathi Case and Its Relevance

The Amarmani Tripathi case, where bail was denied due to evidence tampering risks, is cited as a crucial precedent. Hiray's comparison underscores the potential consequences of releasing the accused on bail, suggesting that similar tampering could occur if the Pune case's defendants were granted bail.

Court Proceedings and Media Coverage

The six accused, including the Agarwals and others, are facing serious charges. The Pune police have filed a comprehensive 900-page chargesheet against them. The court has been urged to consider the severity of evidence tampering, with the prosecution arguing that the media trial claims are unfounded and that the investigation is conducted professionally.

The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) had granted lenient bail terms to the minor, including a 300-word essay on road safety, which sparked nationwide controversy. The main accused's case is ongoing before the Juvenile Justice Board, while the remaining accused face serious legal challenges.

Conclusion

The Pune Porsche car case highlights critical issues of evidence tampering and legal manipulation. The comparison with the Amarmani Tripathi case emphasizes the importance of maintaining judicial integrity to ensure that justice prevails.