Supreme Court Overturns Controversial Calcutta HC Judgement on Adolescent Sexual Urges

Supreme Court Overturns Controversial Calcutta HC 

Judgement on Adolescent Sexual Urges


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has set aside a controversial judgement by the Calcutta High Court, which advised adolescent girls to "control their sexual urges." The SC has restored the conviction under rape charges against a man accused of sexually assaulting a minor, with whom he later entered into a marriage. 


SC Restores Rape Conviction

A bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan reversed the Calcutta High Court's acquittal of the accused, emphasizing that the High Court's observations on adolescent behavior were "problematic" and "highly objectionable."


Guidelines for Judges on Writing Judgments

In a critical move, the Supreme Court also issued guidelines for judges on how to draft judgments in cases involving adolescents, ensuring that personal biases and unwarranted opinions do not influence the judicial process. 


Calcutta HC’s Controversial Observations

Earlier, the High Court had acquitted the man, suggesting that adolescent girls and boys should "rein in sexual urges" and criticized the conflation of consensual acts among adolescents with sexual abuse under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The HC had suggested that controlling sexual urges was a duty, especially for adolescent females, framing it as a matter of dignity and societal perception.


SC's Critique of the HC Judgment

The Supreme Court criticized the High Court for its "preachy" tone, stating that judges are not expected to express personal views or moral judgments in such cases. The apex court’s stance emphasizes that judicial decisions should be rooted in law and facts, not personal ideology.


Amicus Curiae Appointed

Senior advocate Madhavi Divan was appointed as amicus curiae by the Supreme Court to assist in the case, with advocate Liz Mathew assisting her.


A Step Forward in Judicial Sensitivity

This ruling is a step forward in ensuring that the judiciary approaches sensitive cases involving adolescents with the care and objectivity they demand. The SC's decision highlights the importance of protecting the rights of minors while ensuring that justice is not clouded by moralistic views.

Comments

Popular posts

Father of RG Kar Victim Loses Faith in Legal System Amid Allegations of CBI Inconsistencies

Bill Gates Applauds India's 'Namo Drone Didi' Program: A Game-Changer in Rural Empowerment and Agri-Tech

Flight Operations Disrupted Amid India-Pakistan Tensions: Air India and IndiGo Cancel Multiple Flights on May 13, 2025

Your Complete Online Guide to Land Records and Services in Bihar

Equality Before Law

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Rights of a Arrested Person in India

India vs Pressure: Why New Delhi Is Not Backing Down on Russian Oil Amid Global Scrutiny