Malegaon Blast Case: A 17-Year Trial of Pain, Justice & Hope

“Not only the accused but the victims were also on trial.”

These poignant words from Shahid Nadeem, the lawyer representing victims in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, capture the prolonged agony endured by survivors and families of the deceased. As the Mumbai Special NIA Court prepares to pronounce its verdict on July 31, the nation holds its breath — not just for justice, but for closure.

The 2008 Malegaon Blast: A Brief Recap

On September 29, 2008, a powerful bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near Bhikku Chowk, Malegaon — a densely populated, communally sensitive area in Nashik district.

• Fatalities: 6 lives lost

• Injured: 101 people

• Blast Location: Near a mosque during Ramzan, heightening communal tensions

Initially investigated by the Maharashtra ATS, the case was later transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011.

Victims on Trial Too?

According to Advocate Shahid Nadeem, this case hasn’t only tested the judiciary’s capacity for justice — it has tested the endurance of the victims. Over 100 survivors reportedly made the 300-kilometre journey from Nashik to Mumbai to testify, many showcasing their scars, missing limbs, and shattered eyes to prove that the blast happened.

Some accused — notably Accused No. 10, Sudhakar Chaturvedi — reportedly even questioned the legitimacy of the blast, forcing the court to call in survivors to exhibit their injuries as physical evidence.

“They came in the heat and rain… only to be asked to prove their pain,” said Nadeem.

He further added, “This trial became as much about victims as it was about the accused. That is the tragedy of our system.”

The Accused & Legal Status

The seven primary accused currently out on bail include:

• Sadhvi Pragya Thakur (Former MP)

• Major (Retd.) Ramesh Upadhyay

• Sudhakar Chaturvedi

• Ajay Rahirkar

• Sudhakar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya)

• Sameer Kulkarni

Originally, 11 individuals were booked, but charges were ultimately framed against these 7. All deny involvement and claim political targeting.

Defense View

The defense lawyers, including Advocate JP Mishra (for Sadhvi Pragya) and Advocate Ranjeet Sangle (for Dhar Dwivedi), expressed full confidence in acquittal.

“Truth will win,” Mishra said while entering court on the day of the verdict.

The Victims’ Expectations

Locals from Malegaon have spoken emotionally, expressing that “terror has no religion” and that justice is long overdue.

• Some demanded compensation for the injured and families of the deceased.

• Others cautioned that if the verdict appears influenced or biased, “there is no meaning in keeping the people waiting for so long.”

The Trial’s Final Phase

The trial saw final arguments heard by Judge A.K. Lahoti, who reserved the judgment on April 19, 2025. The verdict is now scheduled for July 31, 2025.

The Bigger Picture

The Malegaon blast trial has highlighted the fragility of communal harmony, the psychological toll of prolonged litigation, and the inconsistencies of the Indian criminal justice system. This trial has not only tested the accused in the dock — it has also put the credibility of the investigative and legal institutions on trial.

Closing Thought

As the court prepares to deliver its final word, one truth remains clear: justice delayed must not become justice denied — neither for the victims nor for the falsely accused.

---