Delhi HC Refuses to Suspend Sentence of Former BJP MLA Senger in Unnao Rape Victim's Father's Custodial Death Case

Delhi HC Refuses to Suspend Sentence of Former BJP MLA Senger in Unnao Rape Victim's Father's Custodial Death Case



The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed the plea of former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar, seeking suspension of his sentence during the appeal against his conviction. Sengar is currently serving a 10-year sentence in connection with the custodial death of the father of a rape victim from Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. He has been in custody since April 13, 2018.


Background of the Case


Kuldeep Singh Sengar, along with other accused, was convicted by the Tis Hazari Court in 2018. Sengar is also serving a life sentence for the rape of a minor, stemming from FIRs filed in 2018 at Police Station Makhi, Unnao. These cases were adjudicated by the District and Sessions Judge (West) at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.


High Court's Ruling


Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma dismissed Sengar’s plea for suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal. The High Court acknowledged that Sengar has served six out of the ten years of his imprisonment. However, the court emphasized that the period undergone by a convict is just one factor among several others, such as the gravity of the offense, the nature of the crime, and the impact on public confidence in the judicial system.


Legal Considerations


The High Court noted that the presumption of innocence is erased once the accused has been found guilty. Therefore, in applications seeking suspension of sentence, courts take a prima facie view of the role of the accused and the gravity of the offense as recorded in the conviction judgment. Justice Sharma emphasized that the arguments on the merits of the appeal would be addressed on August 7, depending on how much time the counsels for the co-accused take.


Arguments and Counterarguments


Sengar's counsel argued that the appellant had been in custody since April 13, 2018, and had not misused the liberty granted to him during a brief interim suspension for his daughter’s marriage. The counsel highlighted that Sengar had already served almost six years of his ten-year sentence and that other co-accused who had served more than half of their imprisonment had been granted suspension of sentence.


In contrast, Advocate Ravi Sharma, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), opposed the plea, arguing that Sengar was a key person in the commission of the offense. The SPP pointed out that Sengar's conviction was for causing the death of a witness in a rape case, highlighting the gravity and seriousness of the crime.


Details of the Offense


The background of the case dates back to June 4, 2017, when the minor daughter of the victim was allegedly raped by Sengar after being enticed on the pretext of getting a job. On April 3, 2018, the victim's father was brutally assaulted by the accused in broad daylight while traveling to Unnao for a court hearing. He was later arrested and allegedly succumbed to injuries inflicted during police custody on April 9, 2018.


Transfer of Trial and Protection Orders


The Supreme Court transferred the trial of five related cases from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi on August 1, 2019, and directed the trial to be concluded within 45 days. The apex court also provided protection to the minor rape victim, her lawyer, mother, and other immediate family members, a protection that remains in place to date.


Legal Implications and Future Proceedings


The refusal to suspend Sengar’s sentence underscores the judicial system’s stance on the gravity of the crime and the importance of maintaining public confidence. The next hearing on the merits of the appeal is scheduled for August 7, which will be crucial in determining the future course of this high-profile case.


Conclusion


The Delhi High Court's decision highlights the complex balance between individual rights and public interest in the judicial process. As the case progresses, it will continue to draw significant attention, reflecting the judiciary's commitment to addressing grave offenses with the seriousness they warrant.

Comments

Popular posts

Father of RG Kar Victim Loses Faith in Legal System Amid Allegations of CBI Inconsistencies

Bill Gates Applauds India's 'Namo Drone Didi' Program: A Game-Changer in Rural Empowerment and Agri-Tech

Flight Operations Disrupted Amid India-Pakistan Tensions: Air India and IndiGo Cancel Multiple Flights on May 13, 2025

Equality Before Law

Your Complete Online Guide to Land Records and Services in Bihar

Rights of a Arrested Person in India

Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

India vs Pressure: Why New Delhi Is Not Backing Down on Russian Oil Amid Global Scrutiny

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines