Supreme Court to Decide on Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail in Excise Policy Case Today

Supreme Court to Decide on Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail in Excise Policy Case Today

The Supreme Court is set to deliver its verdict today on the interim bail petition filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the money laundering case lodged against him by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) related to the Delhi excise policy case.

Legal Proceedings

A bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna informed the ED counsel, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, that the court may issue an order regarding interim relief for Kejriwal on Friday. Kejriwal was arrested by the ED on March 21 under a money laundering probe linked to alleged irregularities in the Delhi excise policy for 2021-22.

Previous Developments

During previous hearings, the bench hinted at granting interim bail to Kejriwal to enable his participation in campaigning for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. However, it stipulated that if interim bail were granted, Kejriwal would not be permitted to perform any official duties as Chief Minister.

Objections and Complaint

Kejriwal's legal team raised objections to the ED's affidavit opposing interim bail, alleging a violation of legal procedures. They filed a formal complaint with the Supreme Court's registry, denouncing the affidavit's submission without the court's approval, especially considering the impending decision.

Allegations and Response

The AAP strongly contested the ED's objection to Kejriwal's interim bail, highlighting the lack of evidence incriminating any AAP member after two years of investigation. They criticized the ED's reliance on statements from implicated individuals and characterized Kejriwal's arrest as an abuse of power, particularly during an election period.

Legal Arguments

Kejriwal, in his appeal to the apex court, asserted that his arrest amid the General Elections announcement was politically motivated. The High Court previously dismissed his plea for release, citing his non-cooperation with ED summons over six months, implying that his arrest was a consequence of this non-cooperation rather than political vendetta.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's decision on Kejriwal's interim bail will have significant implications for his participation in electoral activities and the ongoing legal proceedings. The case underscores the intersection of legal, political, and electoral factors, raising questions about procedural fairness and the balance between law enforcement and political rights.

Legislative and Judicial Context

The case involves the interpretation and application of laws related to money laundering, arrest procedures, and bail provisions under Indian legal frameworks. The judiciary's role in safeguarding individual rights, ensuring due process, and addressing allegations of political bias is central to the case's resolution.