State Liability in Requisitioned Vehicles: Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Law in Poll Duty Accidents
1: INTRODUCTION
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the State is liable to pay compensation for accidents involving vehicles requisitioned for public purposes such as election duty. The judgment clarifies that liability follows control, not ownership, thereby preventing governments from shifting responsibility onto private insurers.
2: FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Case arose from a 2010 road accident in Madhya Pradesh
A school bus requisitioned for panchayat election duty collided with a motorcycle
The accident resulted in the death of the rider
Procedural History
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT): Liability fixed on insurer
Madhya Pradesh High Court: Shifted liability to District Magistrate and election authorities
Supreme Court: Upheld High Court ruling
3: BENCH AND PROCEEDINGS
Bench comprising:
Sanjay Karol
N. Kotiswar Singh
Senior Advocate Archana Pathak Dave assisted as amicus curiae
4: CORE ISSUE
Whether liability for compensation in an accident involving a requisitioned vehicle lies with:
The private insurer/owner, or
The State authority that requisitioned and controlled the vehicle
5: SUPREME COURT RULING
The Court held:
Once a vehicle is requisitioned under statutory powers:
Control shifts entirely to the State
Owner loses custody and decision-making authority
Therefore:
Liability must rest with the State authority
Key Principle
Liability under motor accident law is determined by possession and control, not mere ownership
6: REASONING OF THE COURT
6.1 Change in Nature of Control
Owner has no say in:
Deployment
Route
Usage
6.2 Insurance Contract Limitations
Insurance policies cover:
Ordinary and voluntary use of vehicle
They do NOT cover:
Compelled government use
6.3 Public Law Responsibility
When State exercises statutory power:
It must also bear corresponding liability
7: DISTINCTION DRAWN BY COURT
Voluntary Use
Covered by insurance
Owner retains control
Requisitioned Use
Compulsory under law
Full control with State
Liability shifts to State
8: DRIVER LIABILITY ASPECT
Although law permits requisition of vehicles, not explicitly drivers:
If driver is used:
State implicitly accepts:
Driver’s competence
Responsibility for actions
9: STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
9.1 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Governs compensation for road accidents
Liability typically on owner/insurer
Exception carved by Court in requisition cases
9.2 Representation of the People Act, 1951
Representation of the People Act, 1951
Permits requisition of vehicles for election duty
10: CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
Article 21
Constitution of India
Right to life includes right to compensation for wrongful death
Article 300
Constitution of India
Enables suits against government
11: JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS
11.1 State of Rajasthan v. Vidhyawati
Established State liability for acts of its servants
11.2 Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa
Compensation as public law remedy for violation of rights
11.3 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Kailash Nath Kothari
Liability linked to control and employment
12: CORE LEGAL ISSUES
12.1 Control vs Ownership
Determines liability in accident cases
12.2 Scope of Insurance Contracts
Cannot be extended beyond agreed risks
12.3 State Accountability
Exercise of statutory power entails responsibility
13: CONCLUSION
The ruling by the Supreme Court of India establishes a clear legal principle:
When the State takes control, it must also take responsibility.
By holding the government liable in requisitioned vehicle accidents, the Court:
Protects victims’ rights
Prevents unfair burden on private insurers
Reinforces accountability in public administration
This judgment will have far-reaching implications for election management, disaster response, and all forms of State requisition powers.

Comments
Post a Comment