Balwant Singh Rajoana's Mercy Plea: A Case of Delayed Decision on Death Sentence

Balwant Singh Rajoana's Mercy Plea: A Case of Delayed Decision on Death Sentence



Introduction: The Supreme Court's Latest Directive

The Supreme Court of India has directed the Central Government to decide on the mercy petition of Balwant Singh Rajoana, a death-row prisoner convicted for the assassination of former Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh in 1995. The court has set March 18 as the deadline, warning that if no decision is taken, it will proceed to hear the matter on merits.


The Assassination of Beant Singh

The case stems from the August 31, 1995, assassination of Beant Singh, orchestrated via a bomb explosion in Chandigarh. Balwant Singh Rajoana, a sympathizer of the Babbar Khalsa militant group, was convicted and sentenced to death in 2007 by a Chandigarh court. The conviction was upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 2010.

Notably, Rajoana never filed an appeal against the High Court’s decision.


Mercy Petition: Grounds and Delay

Balwant Singh Rajoana filed a mercy petition citing:

  • Extraordinary and Inordinate Delay: A delay of 1 year and 4 months in deciding his petition.
  • Prolonged Incarceration: He has spent 28 years and 8 months in jail, of which 17 years were in a death-row cell, including 2.5 years in solitary confinement.
  • Humanitarian Grounds: Seeking commutation of his death sentence to life imprisonment due to the undue delay in the decision-making process.

The Centre, in 2019, announced its intent to commute Rajoana's death sentence to life imprisonment as a gesture to mark the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev Ji, but the decision remains unimplemented.


Supreme Court’s Stance

In May 2024, the Supreme Court declined to directly commute Rajoana’s death sentence, emphasizing the need for a competent authority to decide his mercy petition. The court has now reiterated its directive, pressing the government for a timely resolution.


Central Government’s Position

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has cited national security and law and order concerns as reasons for deferring the decision on the mercy petition. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta highlighted the case's sensitivity, given its connection to the murder of a sitting Chief Minister, requesting additional time for inputs from multiple agencies.


Timeline of Key Events

  • 1995: Beant Singh assassinated in Chandigarh.
  • 2007: Chandigarh court sentences Rajoana to death.
  • 2010: Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds the death sentence.
  • 2012: Execution scheduled for March 31 but stayed after intervention by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC).
  • 2019: Centre decides to commute Rajoana’s sentence on humanitarian grounds; no action taken.
  • 2024: Supreme Court sets a deadline of March 18 for the government to decide the mercy plea.

Legal and Humanitarian Implications

The case highlights the complex interplay of legal, political, and humanitarian factors:

  • Legal Delay: The prolonged wait raises questions about procedural fairness in cases involving capital punishment.
  • Human Rights: International norms advocate against prolonged death-row incarceration due to its psychological toll.
  • National Security Concerns: The sensitive nature of the case complicates decision-making, given its potential impact on public order.

Conclusion: Awaiting Justice

The Supreme Court's directive serves as a final opportunity for the Central Government to address this long-standing issue. The case underscores the urgent need for timely decision-making in mercy petitions to balance justice, humanitarian considerations, and national security concerns.

As the March 18 deadline approaches, all eyes are on the Centre’s next move, which will not only determine Rajoana’s fate but also set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future.


What’s your take on the delays in mercy petitions? Should prolonged incarceration influence the commutation of death sentences? Share your thoughts below!

Comments