LawLoveLegal

I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India recently delivered strong observations while quashing an FIR registered by the Rajasthan Police against Ashish Dave, former regional head of Zee Rajasthan. The Court criticised the state police for acting like “James Bond” and adopting a “shoot first, ask questions later” approach. The bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta termed the FIR “as bogus an FIR as it can get” and held that allowing such a complaint to survive would send a disturbing message about unequal access to justice. The ruling revisits fundamental questions about the legality of FIR registration, the limits of criminal law, and judicial safeguards against abuse of process. II. Factual Background In September 2023, an FIR was registered at Ashok Nagar Police Station, Jaipur, based on a complaint filed by Zee Media Corporation Limited through its representative Sanju Raju. The complaint alleged that Ashish Dave misused his position as regional head to: Demand money fro...

“Futile Litigations Must Be Chopped Off”: A Judicial Call for Criminal Justice Reform Background of the Case In a significant ruling addressing judicial delay and systemic inefficiency, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court quashed criminal proceedings pending for over 34 years in connection with an alleged ruckus at the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha premises in 1991 . The judgment was delivered by Justice Pankaj Bhatia on January 28 , allowing two petitions filed by Madhukar Sharma and Sanjay Singh , who sought quashing of the entire criminal proceedings arising out of the said incident, which were pending before a district court in Lucknow. Allegations in the 1991 FIR According to the First Information Report (FIR), the alleged incident occurred on February 15, 1991 , when the informant was on duty at Gate No. 1 of the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha . The FIR alleged that: The accused persons, along with 30–40 others , created a ruckus inside the assembly premises They attempted ...