"Clash Over Demolition Drives: Delhi Government vs. Lieutenant Governor"

 "Clash Over Demolition Drives: Delhi Government vs. Lieutenant Governor"



Delhi Government and Lieutenant Governor Clash Over Demolition Drives:


A recent confrontation has erupted between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)-led Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor (LG) over demolition drives targeting slums in the national capital. The Delhi government has accused the LG of ordering the demolition of numerous slum clusters, rendering nearly three lakh slum dwellers homeless since Vinai Kumar Saxena assumed office as LG. However, the LG's office has refuted these claims, calling them "typical and blatant lies" propagated by the Delhi government.


Laws and Legal Context:


The legal framework concerning slum demolitions in Delhi includes provisions of the Delhi Laws Special Provisions Act, 2006, and the Delhi Development Act, 1957. These laws regulate the planning, development, and demolition of unauthorized colonies and slum areas. Additionally, the Master Plan of Delhi, formulated under these acts, provides guidelines for urban development and regularization of unauthorized colonies and slums.


Constitutional Provisions:


The demolition of slums and eviction of slum dwellers must adhere to constitutional provisions ensuring the right to life and livelihood. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, encompassing the right to shelter and adequate living conditions. Article 38 (State to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people) and Article 39 (c) (Equal justice and free legal aid) also uphold the state's responsibility to ensure social justice and protect vulnerable sections of society.


Case Laws:


Several court judgments have emphasized the protection of slum dwellers' rights and the need for procedural fairness in eviction cases. In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985), the Supreme Court held that the right to livelihood includes the right to live in a shelter, highlighting the state's duty to provide alternative accommodation before evicting slum dwellers. Similarly, in Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. (1996), the court emphasized the need for a humane approach in eviction proceedings, ensuring that the basic needs of slum dwellers are not compromised.


Conclusion:


In conclusion, the clash between the Delhi government and the LG over demolition drives underscores the complex issues surrounding urban development, slum regularization, and the protection of slum dwellers' rights. Adherence to legal provisions, constitutional principles, and judicial precedents is essential to ensure that the interests of vulnerable communities are safeguarded while addressing urban development challenges sustainably and equitably.

Comments

Popular posts

Father of RG Kar Victim Loses Faith in Legal System Amid Allegations of CBI Inconsistencies

Bill Gates Applauds India's 'Namo Drone Didi' Program: A Game-Changer in Rural Empowerment and Agri-Tech

Flight Operations Disrupted Amid India-Pakistan Tensions: Air India and IndiGo Cancel Multiple Flights on May 13, 2025

Equality Before Law

Your Complete Online Guide to Land Records and Services in Bihar

Rights of a Arrested Person in India

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

India vs Pressure: Why New Delhi Is Not Backing Down on Russian Oil Amid Global Scrutiny