Article 48 of the Indian Constitution: Protection and Improvement of Environment and Welfare of Animals in the Modern Era

Article 48 of the Indian Constitution: Protection and Improvement of Environment and Welfare of Animals in the Modern Era



Introduction


Article 48 of the Indian Constitution embodies the directive principle of state policy that focuses on the protection and improvement of the environment and the welfare of animals. In the current modern era, marked by environmental degradation and the need for sustainable development, it is essential to discuss the scope, implications, and relevant case laws associated with Article 48.


Understanding Article 48


Article 48 is a part of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) enshrined in Part IV of the Indian Constitution. It states that the state shall endeavor to organize agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines, and shall take steps for the preservation, improvement, and protection of forests and wildlife. It further emphasizes the need to safeguard the environment and prevent cruelty to animals.


Relevant Case Laws Shaping the Interpretation of Article 48


1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1997):

The M.C. Mehta case, popularly known as the Ganges pollution case, dealt with the pollution and degradation of the river Ganges. The Supreme Court held that the state has a constitutional duty to protect and improve the environment. The case emphasized the importance of implementing measures in line with Article 48 to address environmental issues and safeguard natural resources.


2. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (2014):

In this case, the Supreme Court examined the legality of the use of bulls in traditional events like Jallikattu and bullock cart races. The court held that the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, prohibits any form of cruelty to animals, including their use in events that cause pain and suffering. The case highlighted the relevance of Article 48 in promoting the welfare and protection of animals.


3. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (2006):

The Godavarman Thirumulpad case focused on the protection of forests and wildlife. The Supreme Court stressed the importance of preserving forests as essential ecological resources. It emphasized that the state has a duty to protect and improve forests and wildlife in accordance with Article 48. The case highlighted the need for sustainable development and environmental conservation.


Relevance of Article 48 in the Modern Era


1. Sustainable Development:

In the modern era, sustainable development has become a paramount concern. Article 48 emphasizes the need to organize agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines, taking into account ecological balance and environmental sustainability. It calls for practices that promote resource conservation, organic farming, and responsible animal husbandry to achieve long-term socio-economic progress.


2. Biodiversity Conservation:

Environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity pose significant challenges in the modern era. Article 48 recognizes the importance of preserving and protecting forests and wildlife. It encourages the state to implement measures to prevent deforestation, promote afforestation, and safeguard endangered species. By prioritizing biodiversity conservation, India can contribute to global efforts in preserving the planet's ecological balance.


3. Animal Welfare:

Article 48 also focuses on the welfare of animals. In the modern era, there is a growing recognition of the rights and ethical treatment of animals. Implementing legislation and regulations to prevent cruelty to animals, as highlighted in relevant case laws, is essential. It calls for the enforcement of animal welfare laws and the promotion of compassion towards animals in various sectors, including agriculture, entertainment, and research.


Conclusion:


Article 48 of the Indian Constitution recognizes the significance of environmental protection, sustainable development, and animal welfare. The case laws discussed above have played a pivotal role in shaping the interpretation of Article 48 and reinforcing the state's responsibility to safeguard the environment and the welfare of animals. In the modern era, Article 48 remains relevant as it addresses pressing environmental issues and the ethical treatment of animals. By implementing effective policies, promoting sustainable practices, and enforcing animal welfare laws, India can work towards fulfilling the objectives outlined in Article 48 and ensuring a harmonious coexistence between humans, nature, and animals.

Comments