LawLoveLegal

The political developments in Kerala have taken a significant constitutional turn as the State government, led by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan , decided to legally challenge the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to implement the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The move, endorsed by all major political parties except the BJP, raises questions about the constitutional validity, procedural fairness, and democratic implications of the ECI’s decision. Background of the Dispute At a high-level all-party meeting in Thiruvananthapuram , the Kerala government announced its decision to seek legal recourse against the SIR exercise, citing that the ECI’s move to revise voter rolls based on the 2002 electoral list was “unscientific” and “ill-intentioned.” The Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) stated that with the upcoming local body elections scheduled for late 2025, revising the voter rolls in such a hurried and retrospective manner could disrupt the elec...

The Supreme Court of India on Monday clarified that voters in Bihar can continue to submit applications for inclusion, deletion, and correction of entries in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls even after the formal deadline of September 1, 2025 , though it refused to extend the deadline statutorily. Background: Electoral Roll Revision in Bihar The Election Commission of India (ECI) has undertaken a special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, the first such major update in nearly two decades. The draft rolls published in August 2025 excluded approximately 6.5 million names , sparking political controversy and a wave of legal petitions. The revision is significant ahead of the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections , with opposition parties, particularly the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) , alleging mass voter disenfranchisement. Supreme Court’s Directions A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi recorded the ECI’s assurance that appli...