LawLoveLegal

In a sensitive and legally complex ruling, the Bombay High Court has refused permission to terminate a 28-week pregnancy , holding that doing so would amount to foeticide as the foetus is healthy, viable, and capable of independent life . The decision underscores how reproductive autonomy, statutory limits, and foetal rights intersect under Indian constitutional law . The Case in Brief The petition was filed by the mother of an 18-year-old girl , seeking termination of pregnancy that arose from a relationship when the girl was 17 years old . The plea stated that: The relationship involved a promise of marriage An FIR was registered on January 2 after the pregnancy was discovered The teen did not wish to continue the pregnancy Despite acknowledging the personal hardship involved, the Court refused to permit medical termination at this advanced stage. What the Medical Board Found The High Court relied heavily on the medical board’s opinion , which stated that: The pregnancy was at 28 w...

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a parent working from home (WFH) cannot automatically be considered more suitable for child custody than a parent who physically travels to work. In a significant judgment addressing the realities of modern working families, the Court held that the welfare of the child—not parental work arrangements—is the paramount consideration in custody disputes. Contemporary Context: Hybrid Work Culture and Custody Claims The ruling comes amid rising reliance on remote and hybrid work models, where many litigants argue that being physically present at home enhances their caregiving ability. However, the Supreme Court has cautioned against such simplified assumptions. A Bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Ujjal Bhuyan emphasized that in the current socio-economic environment, both parents frequently work to provide economic stability , and physical presence at home does not necessarily translate into availability, emotional nurturing, or superior careg...